
The final hearing may not be held until the engineer has filed the engineer’s detailed survey report, the viewers have filed the viewers’ report, and the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources has filed a final advisory report.685
The drainage authority in consultation with the auditor or secretary of the watershed district, sets the time, place, and location for the final hearing on the petition, the engineer’s detailed survey report, and the viewers’ report.686 The hearing must not be set less than 25 days nor more than 50 days after the date of the final hearing notice.687 A sample Order Setting Time, Place, and Location for Final Hearing is found in Template A .
The final hearing notice must state the following:
For a joint county proceeding, separate notice may be prepared for each county affected, showing the portion of the proposed drainage project and the names and descriptions of affected property in the county.690 A sample Notice of Final Hearing is found in Template B.
It is the auditor’s or secretary’s responsibility to notify the drainage authority, auditors of affected counties, and all interested persons of the time and location of the final hearing by publication, posting, and mail.691
After the final hearing notice is properly given695, the drainage authority has jurisdiction of all property described in the engineer’s and the viewers’ reports, of the persons and municipalities named in the reports, and of all persons having an interest in a mortgage, lien, or encumbrance against the property described in the reports.696
At the final hearing, the engineer or the engineer’s assistant and at least one of the viewers must be present.697
The meeting should again be convened by the chairperson of the drainage authority. The petitioners’ representative should then be given the floor to review the proceedings. The technical aspects of the proposed project should be left to the engineer.
The petitioners’ representative should then return the floor to the chairperson, and the chairperson should give the floor to the project engineer. The engineer, using maps and profiles, should then explain the proposed project. The hearing should then be open for questions for the engineer.
Following the engineer’s presentation, the chairperson should call for the reading of the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources’ (“DNR”) final advisory report.649 The Director of the DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources, or the Director’s designated representative, typically summarizes and highlights the report.650 If the Director is not present, the final advisory report should be read verbatim during the hearing.651
Following the engineer’s presentation, the chairperson should call for the reading of the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources’ (“DNR”) final advisory report.698 The Director of the DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources, or the Director’s designated representative, typically summarizes and highlights the report.699 If the Director is not present, the final advisory report should be read verbatim during the hearing.700
Following the final advisory report one of the viewers, as spokesperson, should present the viewers’ report. It is recommended that copies of the viewers’ report be available for review at the hearing. In any case, owners of property benefitted or damaged by the project will receive a summary of the viewers’ determination of benefits and damages as part of the property owners’ report mailed in advance of the hearing.701 The viewers’ presentation should not be a line by line review of each item of benefits and damages. Rather, it should be a discussion of the approach to viewing adopted by the viewers, any special problems encountered, and a statement of the total amounts of benefits and damages found.
When the hearing is opened to questions from the floor, specific questions or disputes regarding benefits or damages determinations for particular tracts must be allowed to be stated for the record and, where possible, should be addressed to the satisfaction of the drainage authority during the hearing. If such concerns cannot be satisfactorily addressed during the hearing, the drainage authority may recess the hearing in order to allow landowners and the viewers an opportunity to meet on an individual basis in an effort to resolve disputes. In some cases, if there are numerous disputes, it may be appropriate to recess the hearing to a new date and time in order to allow for landowner meetings with the viewers and to allow the viewers to make any revisions to their report. In any case, the viewers should provide resolution of the landowner concern, even if such resolution is a justification for the originally determined benefits or damages.
Small adjustments and compromises frequently will satisfy a landowner’s concerns. Giving the landowner an opportunity to discuss the benefits or damages privately before the establishment order comes out may lead to better understanding of the basis of benefits or damages and will go a long way toward avoiding appeals. When everyone has had a chance to talk to the viewers, and the meeting is reconvened, the viewers present their adjusted report.
685 The drainage code gives the DNR Commissioner 30 days to file its final advisory report. See Minn. Stat. § 103E.301(a) (2015). The drainage authority must ensure that the DNR Commissioner has been afforded, at least, 30 days from the date it receives the engineer’s detailed survey report in which to review, prepare, and file a final advisory report with the drainage authority. Before establishing a project, the drainage authority must determine that “the reports made or amended are complete and correct.” Minn. Stat. § 103E.341, subd. 2(2). If the DNR Commissioner fails to make a report, despite having the opportunity to do so, the drainage authority may proceed with adopting a final order finding that the reports actually made are complete and correct.
686 Minn. Stat. § 103E.325, subd. 1 (2015).
687 Minn. Stat. § 103E.325, subd. 1 (2015).
688 Names may be listed in narrative form and property affected may be separately listed in narrative form by governmental sections or otherwise. Minn. Stat. § 103E.325, subd. 2(b) (2015).
689 Minn. Stat. § 103E.325, subd. 2(a)(1)-(7) (2015).
690 Minn. Stat. § 103E.325, subd. 2(c) (2015).
691 Minn. Stat. § 103E.325, subd. 3 (2015).
692 Minn. Stat. § 103E.325, subd. 3 (2015).
693 Minn. Stat. §§ 103E.325, subd. 3 and 103E.005, subd.24 (2015).
694 Minn. Stat. § 103E.325, subd. 3 (2015).
695 If proper notice has been given to some parties but the notice is defective or not given to other parties, the drainage authority has jurisdiction of all parties that received proper notice. Minn. Stat. § 103E.035 (2015). The proceedings may be continued by order of the drainage authority for the time necessary to publish, post, or mail a new notice. Minn. Stat. § 103E.035 (2015). The new notice needs only to be given to those not properly notified by the first notice. Minn. Stat. § 103E.035 (2015).
696 Minn. Stat. § 103E.331 (2015).
697 Minn. Stat. § 103E.335, subd. 1 (2015).
698 Minn. Stat. § 103E.335, subd. 1 (2015).
699 See Minn. Stat. § 103E.335, subd. 1 (2015).
700 Minn. Stat. § 103E.335, subd. 1 (2015).
701 Minn. Stat. § 103E.323 (2015).
This page was last edited on 19 October 2016, at 17:19.
Template:Footer